The Art of the (Non) Deal: Founders Win, Startups Die
Reverse acquihires are what happen when talent is priceless, but antitrust is inconvenient.
This was the weekend of Windsurf. A $3B deal we all thought was done - OpenAI acquiring Windsurf - suddenly, spectacularly fell apart.
The reason? Microsoft, OpenAI’s biggest investor and infrastructure gatekeeper, reportedly refused to carve out Windsurf’s IP or firewall it from Microsoft's access. OpenAI, entangled in its own hybrid nonprofit structure and partnership obligations, couldn’t close.
Enter Google. In a move both aggressive and surgical, Google struck a $2.4B deal: license Windsurf’s IP and hire CEO Varun Mohan along with key staff. Not an acquisition. No change of control. Just the now-familiar play: reverse acquihire.
The startup remains on paper. The talent walks. The check clears.
The drama of the weekend reveals 4 deeper truths about where we are in the AI arc:
(1) The Individual is the Institution
This isn’t a war for companies - it’s a war for minds. Big Tech is chasing the handful of individuals capable of bending the curve of progress. And they’re willing to pay billions to do it.
When that person works at a rival lab, you offer an absurd comp package.
When they’re the founder of a startup? You extract them through a reverse acquihire.
Either way, the intent is the same: Acquire the mind, not the entity.
Windsurf didn’t get acquired. Varun Mohan and the top researchers did.
This is the logical extension of AI’s promise: leverage. The best AI tools reduce the marginal cost of execution. Which means the scarcest resource becomes judgment and taste.
These deals aren’t just about avoiding antitrust - they’re a structural bet on a shift in power: When creation is cheap, the creator becomes priceless. The conductor is now worth more than the orchestra.
(2) The Safety Net is Gone
The Windsurf deal didn’t just extract talent - it left many employees behind.
Only those with vested equity will see a payout. Late joiners? Marooned at a gutted company with no clear future.
The company retained $100M that may be used to pay them out, eventually, if it shuts down. But the social contract that made startup risk tolerable? That’s the real thing being unwound here. Incentives propping up the startup ecosystem are quietly collapsing.
In the old model:
A startup fails → it gets acquired → everyone gets something
Founders get rich, early employees land at Big Tech, VCs salvage capital
This formed a cushioned risk loop that made ambitious building attractive to everyone. In the new model:
Big Tech skips the acquisition
Hires the founders
Pays for the IP
Leaves the rest behind
The classic acquihire was a safety net. The reverse acquihire is a surgical strike.
The long-term risk isn’t just fewer startups - it’s fewer startup employees. The early-career engineer, the ambitious PM, the risk-taking designer - they’re less likely to bet on a startup that offers no real backstop. The rational move for ambitious talent is to join Big Tech directly. And that’s not a win for innovation.
(3) The Workaround is Now the Playbook
The Reverse Acquihire era is here to stay. We’ve now seen this model play out across Adept, Inflection, Covariant, Character.AI, and Windsurf. The pattern is predictable:
License the tech (non-exclusively)
Hire the founders and key talent
Leave the company standing, but empty
This structure has 3 key benefits:
Avoids antitrust scrutiny. It’s not a formal merger or acquisition, so regulators can’t easily block it.
Keeps legal separation. Useful when the startup has existing obligations (like cap tables, customer contracts, or licensing deals).
Prioritizes people, not org charts. In AI, it’s often faster to lift out the founding brain trust than to integrate an entire company.
For investors, the deal is... foggy. Some may get a capped return. Others may be left holding equity in a shell. Many people have asked me over the weekend why investors would approve such a deal. Well, there is nothing to approve since there’s no acquisition. Founders are just resigning. IP isn’t sold, just licensed. Investors are informed. Maybe consulted. But they’re not in control.
(4) The Tribal Phase Has Begun
Each reverse acquihire doesn’t just remove a company from the map. It assigns its talent - and its worldview - to one of a handful of dominant camps. The creative chaos of early AI is giving way to five Cold War blocs, well-funded and worldview-locked, racing towards AGI.
OpenAI: alignment-through-capability
Anthropic: safety-first constitutionalism
xAI: free speech maximalism
Google DeepMind: science-forward elite
Meta: open-ish weights, closed intent
Each is building its own internal stack, its own governance philosophy, its own reality-distortion field. And with each move, the space gets narrower, more hardened, and less open to wild, bottom-up invention.
(Update as of 10:35PM PT, July 14)
Turns out the Windsurf saga wasn’t over. Minutes after I hit publish, Cognition - the company behind Devin, the autonomous developer - announced that they are acquiring Windsurf.
Cognition will take ownership of Windsurf’s product, IP, trademark, and fast-scaling business - $82M ARR, 350+ enterprise customers, and hundreds of thousands of DAUs. Strategically, this is a strong move. Devin plus Windsurf is a powerful combination: a fully agentic developer meets an agentic IDE. From agents that write code to interfaces that orchestrate them.
Google got the brain trust (Varun + select researchers) and Cognition got the company. Seems like a double-dispatch deal: first, a reverse acquihire; now, a more traditional acquisition of the remaining assets.
To their credit, Cognition is structuring this as a whole-team win-with full acceleration, waived cliffs, and financial participation for all employees. That’s rare, and commendable. After a weekend of whiplash, the employees who stayed are finally made whole. Google took the founder. Cognition took the high road - and won the narrative.
Windsurf may go down as the first AI startup to be acquired twice in one week ... without ever being sold the first time. One company. Two exits. Zero precedent.
Crazy moves by big players indeed!
I am a bit removed from this action but it seems that Google got screwed. $2.4bn for "brains" and now they still have to pay license fees for Windsurf that is now owned by an independent company with all their staff. That's where the real IP is!
It's funny how most people, especially in the Bay Area, worship the leaders of companies that are publicly visible. I am afraid those two (or more?) guys are worthless for Google.
I think what people and analysts will realize in two years is that such acquisitions are wroth $0 and will be part of the intangible assets :-) AI is at its very early innings and code gen and other power use cases are not at all mature -not to mention that the agent tech does not work yet (read research papers on the topic). If Google wanted to fill a gap in their offering, they should have bought the whole IP and team to do so. Instead, they got the crumbs.
My guess is that Windsurf probably played them against each other when they negotiated the deal and they saw that OpenAI got out, they fell for it. On paper, it looks like a great win from the Google VC arm: "boss, you got them, we beat OpenAI and Microsoft!". Until the 22 hour and act 3 of this drama.
On a side note, just wanted to say thank you for sharing your wisdom and analysis on those topics. I got to follow you recently on LinkedIn and you are one of the few individuals that delivers value i every post!
Nice article, very well written. Do you see this trend continuing particularly in the AI infra and platforms space where the big players want to dominate?